Paolo Cugini
A time will come, and it has
already begun, when peoples will no longer be able to save themselves by
closing doors, raising walls, or guarding their traditions like immobile
relics. A time will come when what we now call contamination will no longer appear
as a threat, but as the secret place where life prepares new forms of humanity.
For every culture that claims to remain pure ends up sterile, and every
identity that fears encounter reveals, precisely through fear, the fragility of
its own roots.
Contamination, in its negative
sense, arises from a defensive outlook. It is thought of as a loss of original
identity, a symbolic infection that undermines the purity of a people, a
culture, a faith, an idea. It is the prejudice that arises when a community
perceives itself as complete in itself and considers only what comes from
within as valid: its values, its codes, its memories, its ways of life.
Everything that comes from outside then becomes suspect, because it does not
bear the mark of belonging, and what does not belong is easily transformed into
danger.
From this perspective, the
other is no longer a face to be listened to, but a contaminant to be rejected.
Difference is not a promise, but a risk. The border is not a space of passage,
but a line of separation. Thus, culture becomes a fortress, and identity an
armed garrison. Modernity, with its need for order, classification, and stable
belonging, has often fueled this vision: it has imagined compact identities,
homogeneous peoples, linear traditions, uncontaminated origins. But this image
is more myth than reality.
Indeed, there is no culture
born pure, no tradition that does not bear within it traces of encounters,
exchanges, conflicts, migrations, translations, borrowings, and wounds. Even
the cultures most jealous of their origins are, upon closer inspection, the
result of contaminations sedimented over time. Languages are archives of
words from elsewhere; cuisines are maps of travels and conquests; religions
have traversed peoples and territories, transforming through contact; the arts
have continually learned from foreign forms. What is defended today as
authentic is often the fruit of ancient, forgotten grafts.
For this reason, the word
contamination must be freed from its negative prison. It does not necessarily
indicate corruption, loss, or decay. On the contrary, it can indicate
fertilization. It can be a sign that a culture is alive, because only that
which is alive enters into relationships, absorbs, transforms, and gives back.
No living organism grows by remaining identical; it grows because it exchanges,
breathes, receives, and assimilates. Likewise, a culture that does not allow
itself to be challenged by what it encounters fails to preserve its own
identity: it freezes it.
Identity is not a statue
placed in the center of a square, immobile and untouchable. Rather, it is a
journey, a story, a voice that changes tone without losing its depth. Being
faithful to one's origins does not mean repeating the same gestures over and over,
but rather recognizing the promise that origins held within. True faithfulness
is not immobility; it is the ability to generate the future. A tradition that
is incapable of encountering the other becomes traditionalism; a memory that
refuses to be questioned becomes nostalgia; a sense of belonging that defends
itself from otherness becomes ideology.
When a society calls something
simply different "contaminated," it paves the way for exclusion.
First comes the word: impure, foreign, dangerous, incompatible. Then comes
suspicion. Then comes distance. Then comes the moral justification for rejection.
The rhetoric of purity is never innocent, because it establishes who can belong
and who must remain outside, who is a bearer of value and who is reduced to a
threat. Thus, cultural fear becomes social fear, and social fear can become
symbolic, political, even religious violence.
Yet, history teaches another
law: what is mixed is not always lost; it is often fulfilled. Cultures die not
because they are crossed, but because they cease to cross. They are not
impoverished because they receive new words, new gestures, new symbols; they
become impoverished when they no longer have the strength to reinterpret them.
Cultural contamination then becomes a school of humility: it teaches that no
one possesses the entire truth, that every identity is also indebted, that
every people has been touched by gifts from afar.
The prophecy of our time,
therefore, consists in moving from the fear of contamination to the wisdom of
encounter. It's not about dissolving identities into a global blur, nor about
renouncing the roots that gave us birth. Rather, it's about understanding that
roots are not chains: they are nourishing organs. And a living root doesn't
fear the soil it encounters; it passes through it, absorbs it, transforms it
into sap.
This is why we must proclaim
forcefully: do not be afraid of cultures arriving, of words knocking, of faces
bearing different narratives. Rather, be afraid of closed identities, of
memories rendered idolatrous, of traditions transformed into walls. Because the
future will belong not to the pure, but to the fruitful; not to those who have
preserved a form intact, but to those who have been able to generate life from
encounter. Contamination, when lived in freedom, discernment, and justice, does
not erase identity: it reveals it as a promise still unfulfilled.
.jpeg)
